Source: Tsu |
Alterative
Social Media Structures: Tsu
For this blog post I wanted to delve a little further into
Fuch’s critique of social media structures and platforms as being hyper
exploitative of their users (in the sense that users are seldom paid for their
revenue generating labour on the platforms). In-class discussion surrounding
this issue seemed to indicate that we are quite far from a consensus on whether
or not these platforms offer a fair trade for unpaid labour. To hopefully add
to this discussion I would like to present the social media platform Tsu. Tsu
is an alternative social media structure that aims to pay users for their
content. It largely appears to be trying to compete with Facebook by offering similar services to users while giving them a
large share of revenue that they generate (90% of advertising and 50% of
content driven revenue).
The space constraints of these posts limits the level of
analysis that can be offered here but at first glance Tsu seems to be attempting to address the issue of exploitation
without appropriate monetary compensation. While it seems that such a social
media structure is a step in the right direction there may still be issues with
privacy rights regarding personal information, ownership, access to
information, and user agency. Further research is needed to determine whether or
not such issues are addressed by the platform (although a restructuring of the
company so that users have a voice within its operation in the social
democratic manner that Fuchs describes in chapter 3 might help).
What I am hoping to point out by introducing Tsu is that an alternative social media
structure is not just possible but already exists. Such alternative structures
may even be profitable (and thus viable) within our current socio-economic structure
(as some may argue that alternative media structures are not viable within
neo-liberalism). We do not need to settle or advocate for current social media
structures without considering alternatives. I would urge readers to seriously
consider whether or not we wish to express to the world, through compliance
with existing social media structures, that unpaid exploitation is acceptable
within our social system (as servitude is a slippery and dangerous slope).
Works Cited
N.A.. Facebook.
Facebook 2016. Accessed 21 January 2016 <www.facebook.com>.
Fuchs, Christian. Social
Media: A Critical Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Inc., 2014.
N.A.. Tsu. Tsu LLC
2016. Accessed 21 January 2016 <http://www.tsu.co/>.
I think we should all join Tsu as a class experiment!
ReplyDeleteThanks for providing an example of an alternative social media model. The question for me remains: do users care? Or are we so inoculated into false consciousness of participatory democracy that we cannot grasp this illusive form of exploitation? You make a good point: are alternative media structures able to survive in a neoliberal economy? It's hard to imagine a mass exodus of Facebook and other popular social media sites without imagining a total revolution against neoliberalism. Or am I thinking too big? It's hard to capture or pin down the exactness of our exploitation in cognitive capitalism and I truly think that is the point.
ReplyDeleteLast part should read *I truly think that is neoliberalism's greatest success so far*
Delete